Understanding Coping Mechanisms
Coping mechanisms are the cognitive and behavioural efforts we use to manage, tolerate or reduce psychological stress. These dynamic responses can be effective/ineffective or adaptive/maladaptive. Psychologists define coping as the cognitive and behavioural efforts used to manage specific internal or external demands that exceed an individual’s resources. Coping is generally seen as a response to a stressor. Stressors can come in many forms, environmental, psychological or sociological but the end result is the same: stress.
Diverse Coping Mechanisms: Types and Their Application

Most of the literature identifies two main coping types: emotion-focused and problem-focused coping. Some add meaning-focused, social coping and avoidance-focused coping. The Folkman and Lazarus’ model describes coping in terms of two main functions: problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping. Problem-focused coping is aimed at managing or changing the problem causing the distress, while emotion-focused coping is aimed at regulating the emotional response to stress.
- Emotion-Focused Coping: This coping type involves reducing the negative-emotional states associated with a stressor. The goal is to regulate emotional distress by changing one’s emotional response to the stressor, even if the stressor itself remains unchanging. This can be done through distraction where a person engages in activities that temporarily takes their mind off the stressor providing short-term relief; as well as cognitive reappraisal or changing one’s interpretation of the stressful situation to reduce its emotional impact.
- Problem-Focused Coping: This involves controlling work stressors by defining and interpreting them, planning solutions and choosing a course of action. This is most effective when the individual has control over the outcome. Problem-focused coping involves actively addressing the stressor by identifying the problem, generating solutions and implementing the best course of action.
- Meaning-Focused Coping: This coping type uses cognitive strategies to process and make sense of a situation. Like emotion-focused coping this is best used when one can’t control the situation. Meaning-focused coping is a cognitive process where the goal is to find or create positive meaning in the experience which leads to stress reduction. This is often found when one participates in religious activities to make sense of a stressor giving the person a sense of understanding and control over the experience.
- Social Coping: This involves seeking help from others, for example, mobilising social support. Social coping means going to friends, family or other support systems for emotional, informational or tangible help.
- Avoidance-Focused Coping: Meyerson et al. (2022) and Pang and Thomas (2020) identify avoidance-focused coping as a distinct ‘fifth coping strategy’. Avoidance coping means avoiding to think about, deal with or confront a stressor. While avoidance coping may provide short-term relief in overwhelming situations, chronic avoidance can contribute to prolonged stress, anxiety disorders, and maladaptive behavioural patterns.
Adaptive vs. Maladaptive Coping Strategies
Healthy coping mechanisms can reduce the nature and impact of the psychological response; they benefit the individual and don’t have negative consequences. Adaptive coping mechanisms solve the source of stress and promote well-being. Maladaptive coping mechanisms may provide temporary relief but ultimately make the problem worse or create new ones. Some consider maladaptive coping as “non-coping” because the stressor isn’t being addressed. Maladaptive coping mechanisms include substance abuse, denial, disengagement and self-blame.
Coping Mechanisms

Coping responses to stress can be divided into voluntary coping (top-down control) and involuntary coping (bottom-up, autonomic-driven responses). Voluntary coping includes mobilising social support, as well as cognitive strategies such as rehearsal of responses to danger, or reframing stressors. Involuntary coping, regulated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS) includes physiological responses such as fight, flight or freeze responses which occur automatically in response to perceived or actual threats.
- Cognitive reframing is the positive emotional and/or cognitive appraisal of a stressful situation and is super helpful in building resilience and adapting to adversity.
- Meditation and breathing calm the mind and body and reduce stress and anxiety.
- Journaling can be a therapeutic and reflective practice when faced with a challenge.
- Positive thinking and forgiveness are straight up positive psychology strategies.
- Laughter can be an outlet for negative emotions and stimulate the physiological system that decreases stress hormones.
Problem-Focused Coping Strategies
Problem focused coping is actively addressing the source of stress and is most effective when you have control over the stressor. Strategies include problem solving, time management, assertiveness and seeking information. It’s especially useful when faced with challenges that are seen as controllable.Chronic stress or maladaptive coping can lead to dysregulated dopamine pathways, reinforcing habitual avoidance or impulsive behaviours rather than adaptive problem-solving. By using effective problem focused strategies you can regain control and reduce the impact of stressors on your well-being.
The Role of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) in Coping
Trauma can mess with your coping mechanisms and often leaves your Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) deregulated. Phase 1: Stabilisation is about calming down a dysregulated ANS that’s easy to trigger and when hyperactivated can contribute to excessive anxiety, impulsivity and cravings. This dysregulation can show up as chronic hyperarousal or hypoarousal, making it hard to manage stress. Developing coping skills, especially those that self-regulate the ANS becomes key to mitigating the impact and recovery from trauma. Here a carefully blended mix of biological, psychological and social tools can calm the ANS, these include yoga, personal training, somatic massage, healthy diet, sleep hygiene and a supportive social environment.
Therapeutic Interventions to Enhance Coping Skills
There are several therapeutic approaches to enhance coping skills. Trauma-focused Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (TF-CBT) is particularly good for people who have experienced trauma, helping them process traumatic memories and develop adaptive coping strategies. In this stage of recovery clients will start to “decouple” the stimulus-response mechanism where certain triggers trigger an overactive ANS response. The goal is to reduce ANS overactivation in response to triggers, allowing individuals to respond in a more regulated way. These interventions will also enhance self-regulation so that people can respond more thoughtfully and less reactively to stressors. The clinical team will determine the modality used and will choose the one that will work best for each individual client’s situation to create healthier coping mechanisms.
Building Resilience Through Effective Coping
Resilience is the ability to bounce back from adversity and is closely linked to good coping. By developing and using adaptive coping mechanisms you can build your resilience and overall mental health. Resilience allows you to adapt in the face of adversity, trauma, tragedy, threat or significant stress.
Highlands Recovery, located near Sydney in Australia is an Institute of Behavioural Medicine and runs a clinical program based on this model of care. The centre provides a private and personal environment with a maximum of 10 clients at any one time so you can have individual attention. You can stay at Highlands Recovery for as long as you feel you need to for your recovery.
Reviewed by: Dr. Emma Bardsley

Dr Emma Bardsley is a neuroscientist with a PhD from Oxford and a post doctorate from Auckland University, along with an undergraduate degree in Pharmacology from King’s College London. She has lectured extensively on neuroscience, physiology, and pharmacological interventions, bridging foundational research and its clinical applications. With a strong record of publications in high-impact journals and extensive experience in scientific writing, editing, and peer review, she excels at translating complex research into practical insights. Based in New Zealand and collaborating internationally, Emma is dedicated to advancing understanding and treatment in the fields of trauma, addiction, and recovery.
References
Laborde S. Bridging the gap between emotion and cognition: An overview. Performance psychology. 2016 Jan 1:275-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803377-7.00017-X
Gross, J. J. Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects. Psychol. Inq. 26, 1–26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
Etkin, A., Büchel, C. & Gross, J. J. The neural bases of emotion regulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 693–700 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn4044
Dixon, M. L., Thiruchselvam, R., Todd, R. & Christoff, K. Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review. Psychol. Bull. 143, 1033–1081 (2017). https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/bul0000096
Schultz, W. Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 18, 23–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.1/wschultz
Glimcher, P. W. Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: The dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 15647–15654 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014269108