Understanding Enabling: When Helping Becomes Harmful
Enabling is often misunderstood as supportive or protective behaviour, but in the context of behavioural medicine, enabling refers to actions that reinforce maladaptive behaviours, preventing individuals from recognising the need for change. Enabling operates within the Biopsychosocial Model, meaning its root causes are complex and multifaceted. Biological predispositions, psychological factors and social influences all contribute to its role in addiction, trauma-related disorders, and other mood and anxiety conditions.

Understanding enabling requires a multidisciplinary approach integrating neuroscience, psychology and environmental factors to uncover its underlying mechanisms. Without addressing these drivers, interventions often fail to support long-term recovery leaving individuals engaging in repeated patterns of dependency and emotional distress. .
The Neurobiology of Reward and Enabling
The brain’s reward system, particularly the dopaminergic pathways, plays a fundamental role in reinforcing enabling behaviours. While dopamine is often associated with pleasure, its primary function is reward anticipation. This means that enabling behaviours can themselves become self-reinforcing through neural conditioning.
For example, when an enabler protects someone they care about from negative consequences, they may anticipate a sense of relief, leading to anticipatory dopamine release and reinforcing this behaviour pattern, making the action of enabling habitual and deeply ingrained. Research has shown that dopamine can be released even when an expected reward does not occur, highlighting the importance of anticipation in maintaining enabling patterns of behaviour. Understanding these neurobiological mechanisms will help researchers to develop effective and targeted interventions that disrupt enabling behaviours and promote healthy coping strategies.
Identifying Enabling Behaviours: A Clinical Taxonomy
Enabling behaviours can manifest in various forms, often with the intention of protecting or supporting a loved one. However, these behaviours ultimately shield individuals from natural consequences, reinforcing unhealthy dependencies. A clinical taxonomy can help to identify and address these behaviours effectively::
- Minimising: Downplaying the severity of the individual’s behaviour or its consequences.Rationalising: Making excuses for maladaptive behaviours.
- Shielding: Protecting the individual from the natural repercussions of their choices.
- Controlling: Attempting to manage the situation by taking responsibility for the individuals actions, decisions, or circumstances
- Accommodating: Altering one’s own behaviour,routine, or environment to sustain the individual’s maladaptive patterns.
While these behaviours are often driven by care and concern, they ultimately hinder self-awareness, accountability, and remove the need or motivation to change.
The Link Between Trauma and Enabling Dynamics

Trauma plays a significant role in enabling, underpinning the enablers motivation and influencing the individuals behaviour patterns. Enablers, often driven by empathy and a desire to alleviate suffering, may unknowingly perpetuate maladaptive behaviours in an attempt to reduce distress.
Moreover, Understanding the enablers often have their own history of trauma , which can lead to a lack of, or distorted personal boundaries, making them more likely to engage in enabling behaviours as a coping mechanism. Conversely, the individual struggling with maladaptive behaviours such as addiction or compulsion-related disorders, the individual engaging in maladaptive behaviours may also have a history of trauma, exacerbating the cycle of enabling and dependence.
Breaking this cycle requires addressing trauma in both the enabler and the dependent individual, helping them to develop healthier relational patterns, as well as individual and self-directed coping strategies.
The Impact of Enabling on Self-Directed Health
At its core, enabling undermines an individual’s ability to self-direct their health, a foundational principle of behavioural medicine. By shielding individuals from the consequences of their actions, enabling prevents the dependent individual from developing self awareness, accountability, and the skills to navigate challenges independently. Self-directed health is about empowering individuals to take control of their wellbeing and make informed decisions. Enabling behaviours erode this autonomy, reinforcing external reliance rather than internal resilience.
Breaking the Cycle of Enabling: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Addressing enabling requires a comprehensive intervention strategy that integrates psychological, social and environmental strategies. Key interventions include:
- Education and awareness. Helping enablers to understand the dynamics of enabling and how their actions contribute to supporting another’s maladaptive behaviours.
- Boundary setting. Establishing clear and consistent boundaries to encourage accountability t.
- Support Systems. Connecting enablers with support groups or therapists who can provide guidance and reinforcement.
Sinceenabling is a complex, deeply ingrained pattern of behaviour, breaking free requires intentional, sustained and consistent effort across multiple domains.
Strategies for Fostering Independence and Accountability
Rather than enabling, individuals can promote independence and self-responsibility by:
- Encouraging professional help. Connect the dependent individual with therapy or counselling, 12 step programmes or medical interventions.
- Promoting self-responsibility. Support the dependent individual to take ownership of their actions and recovery process.
- Setting clear expectations: Communicating boundaries and accountability measures.
These strategies shift the focus from external enabling and rescue to internal resilience, empowering individuals to take control of their lives and make sustainable changes.
The Importance of Self-Care for Enablers: A Focus on Wellbeing

Breaking enabling patterns can be emotionally challenging, and enablers should prioritise their own wellbeing. Some self-care strategies might include:
- Practicing self-compassion. Recognising that enabling often stems from good intentions.
- Seeking support. Connecting with support groups or therapists who understand enabling dynamics.Engaging in holistic self-care: Prioritising physical, emotional and mental wellbeing to sustain healthy boundaries.
- Reconnecting with hobbies. Exploring personal interests and creative outlets that bring joy, fulfilment and a sense of identity beyond caregiving.
- Strengthening relationships with friends and family. Nurturing reciprocal healthy relationships that provide support, perspective and connection.
By caring for themselves, enablers can develop the emotional resilience needed to support others in a healthy way, without reinforcing maladaptive behaviours.
Maintaining Healthy Boundaries for Long-Term Recovery
Sustaining healthy relationships and setting appropriate boundaries requires continuous self-reflection and support, while long-term strategies for maintaining balance and accountability includes consistent boundary enforcement to prevent relapse into enabling behaviours, ongoing vigilance and self-assessment to recognise emerginc patterns of enabling, seeking professional guidance when needed to reinforce healthy relational dynamics, exploration of group therapy or 12-step support programmes for partners or family members of people suffering from addiction. By integrating these practices, enabling partners or family members can support long-term recovery without compromising their own health and wellbeing.
Highlands Recovery: A Holistic Approach to Behavioural Change
At Highlands Recovery, we apply the principles of behavioural medicine, emphasising self-directed health and addressing the underlying causes of maladaptive patterns. Our intensive residential programme takes a dynamic, multifaceted approach, which may include:
- Individual therapy to help clients stabilise, process trauma, and address psychological and emotional triggers.
- Group therapy to help build support networks, foster a sense of belonging and encourage shared experiences .
- Pharmacological interventions to help support the recovery process where appropriate.
By addressing the biological, psychological and social factors that sustain enabling behaviours and dependency, Highlands Recovery equips individuals with the skills and strategies needed for lasting change, self-resilience and sustainable recovery.
Reviewed by: Dr. Emma Bardsley

Dr Emma Bardsley is a neuroscientist with a PhD from Oxford and a post doctorate from Auckland University, along with an undergraduate degree in Pharmacology from King’s College London. She has lectured extensively on neuroscience, physiology, and pharmacological interventions, bridging foundational research and its clinical applications. With a strong record of publications in high-impact journals and extensive experience in scientific writing, editing, and peer review, she excels at translating complex research into practical insights. Based in New Zealand and collaborating internationally, Emma is dedicated to advancing understanding and treatment in the fields of trauma, addiction, and recovery.
References
Hyman, S. E., Malenka, R. C. & Nestler, E. J. Neural Mechanisms of Addiction: The Role of Reward-Related Learning and Memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 565–598 (2006).https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113009
Pierce, R. C. & Kumaresan, V. The mesolimbic dopamine system: The final common pathway for the reinforcing effect of drugs of abuse? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 215–238 (2006).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.016
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T. & Fang, A. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cogn. Ther. Res. 36, 427–440 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1
Koob, G. F. & Volkow, N. D. Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 3, 760–773 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00104-8
Larsen, E. M., Ospina, L. H., Cuesta-Diaz, A., Vian-Lains, A., Nitzburg, G. C., Mulaimovic, S., Latifoglu, A., Clari, R. & Burdick, K. E. Effects of childhood trauma on adult moral decision-making: Clinical correlates and insights from bipolar disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 244, 180–186 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.002